What’s the Difference Between a LoRaWAN Gateway and a LoRa Node?

In the smart street lamp system in Oslo, Norway, a single lorawan gateway manages 3,800 LoRa nodes within a 12-kilometer radius through a star topology and processes 54,000 data streams of illuminance (accuracy ±0.5lux) and ambient temperature (error ≤0.3℃) every day. The node device only needs to transfer 12 bytes of payload every 5 minutes, with an average operating current of 18μA (as low as 0.8μA in sleep state), and a single CR2032 battery can maintain a battery life of 5.3 years. The gateway requires an external 48V power supply to support a peak power of 24W, with an annual power consumption cost of approximately 58 US dollars. The measured data of Deutsche Telekom shows that the MG901 gateway processes 500 uplink data packets per second (with a maximum access capacity of 10,000 nodes), while the daily communication energy consumption of a typical LoRa node (such as the Semtech SX1276 module) is only 2 joules, and the energy efficiency difference is three orders of magnitude.

The differences in hardware capabilities directly determine the functional positioning. The industrial-grade gateway is equipped with a quad-core ARM Cortex-A53 processor and 4GB of memory, and supports real-time edge computing. In the Port of Rotterdam project in the Netherlands, the gateway directly analyzes the data stream of 12,000 container temperature and humidity sensors (with a delay of < 90ms). When a sudden temperature change (±4℃/min) is detected, an alarm is triggered immediately. Reduce the rate of goods damage by 23%. In contrast, LoRa nodes are only equipped with 32KB of RAM and 64KB of flash memory, and it takes 42ms to perform the basic AES-128 encryption. In the UK smart farm case, the soil node can only convert the original analog signal into a 14-bit digital quantity (with an accuracy loss of ≥1.2%), and needs to rely on the gateway for temperature compensation calibration (with a final error of 0.1%).

LG1 LoRaWAN Gateway

The differences in cost structure stem from the scale effect and complexity. The unit price of LoRa nodes is only 2.8 to 20 US dollars (bulk price from Wenzhou manufacturers), and the total hardware cost for deploying 450,000 nodes in the Chicago smart water meter project is 7.2 million US dollars. The unit price of the gateway is in the range of 500 to 1,500 US dollars (for example, the Siemens MIC700 supports a wide temperature range from -40℃ to 75℃), and the same project only requires 120 gateways with an investment of 180,000 US dollars. Spectrum licensing fees further highlight the differences: The EU’s 868MHz frequency band requires gateways to pay an annual licensing fee of 150 US dollars, while nodes communicate completely without licensing. The gap in security investment is particularly large: The gateway needs to pass ISO 27001 certification and deploy AES-256 encryption (the key is updated every hour), through which French gas companies intercept 42% of illegal access. Nodes usually have no physical protection. The LoRa nodes of Norwegian fishing buoys rely on gateway firewalls to filter out 98% of malicious traffic.

Disaster response cases reveal collaborative value. In the 2023 earthquake in Turkey, the solar-powered lorawan gateway constructed a backbone network with a coverage radius of 25 kilometers, commanding 2,800 life detection nodes to send back vital sign data every 3 seconds. At this time, the node only consumes 0.6mW of transmission power, while the gateway requires 50W of power to relay the satellite link. In the handling of the nuclear accident in Fukushima, Japan, the radiation-resistant node (with a endurance of 42 days) collected data in the 700Gy/h dose area, and the gateway parsed the information in the safety zone 3 kilometers away – this risk-sharing mechanism reduced the total monitoring cost by 76%.

The LoRa Alliance Technology White Paper points out that 90% of the life cycle cost of nodes (about 0.8 US dollars per year) comes from battery replacement and manual maintenance, while the core value of gateways lies in the effect of network resource intensification. The project of Shenzhen Water Affairs Bureau confirmed that lorawan gateway can reduce core network traffic by 98% and save 1.7 million US dollars in annual cloud service expenditures. Understanding this system-level division of labor is the key to maximizing the economic efficiency of LPWAN technology – the gateway is the network hub, and the node is the perception terminal. The two work together to build a low-cost Internet of Things ecosystem.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *